News & Updates

2016 Ford Explorer Fuel Tank Size What You Need To Know Range Road Trip Specs

By Elena Petrova 8 min read 2917 views

2016 Ford Explorer Fuel Tank Size What You Need To Know Range Road Trip Specs

The 2016 Ford Explorer carries a 24.0-gallon fuel tank, providing a competitive balance between interior space and driving range. This capacity supports an estimated range of up to 400 miles, depending on configuration and driving conditions. Understanding the tank’s dimensions, fuel system design, and real-world efficiency helps owners and buyers plan trips and manage ownership costs.

Official Specifications and Engineering Context

According to Ford’s published specifications for the 2016 model year, the Explorer’s fuel tank capacity is listed as 24.0 gallons. This figure represents the total volume of the tank, including the portion reserved for vapor recovery and expansion. Engineers designed the tank to balance fuel capacity with the vehicle’s overall weight distribution and packaging requirements.

The 2016 Explorer was offered with several powertrain options, including a 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 and a 3.3-liter V6, paired with a six-speed automatic transmission. While fuel economy varied between engines, the shared tank size allowed for consistent range expectations across most trims. The tank is constructed of high-density polyethylene, a common material in modern vehicles that offers durability and resistance to corrosion.

Estimating Driving Range and Real-World Variables

With a 24.0-gallon tank, the 2016 Ford Explorer can cover substantial distances between fill-ups. Using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates, the combined fuel economy for the Explorer’s 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 is approximately 21 miles per gallon. Multiplying this by the 24.0-gallon tank yields a theoretical maximum range of just over 500 miles. However, real-world driving conditions typically reduce this figure.

  • City driving, with frequent stops and lower speeds, often results in lower fuel efficiency.
  • Highway cruising at steady speeds generally improves mileage and extends range.
  • Terrain, weather, and payload weight can all impact fuel consumption.

For example, a 2016 Explorer traveling on the highway at 65 mph might achieve closer to 27 miles per gallon, pushing the practical range toward 450 miles. Drivers who frequently carry heavy loads or use air conditioning heavily may see a reduction of 10 to 15 percent in fuel economy.

Fuel System Design and Safety Considerations

The 2016 Explorer’s fuel system is designed with several safety and emissions-control components. These include a rollover check valve, which prevents fuel from spilling during sharp turns or rollovers, and an evaporative emission control system that captures fuel vapors and returns them to the tank.

Ford’s engineers also considered the placement of the fuel tank within the vehicle’s chassis. The tank is located beneath the rear cargo area, which helps protect it in the event of a front or side collision. The use of a sealed, pressurized system reduces the risk of vapor leaks and improves overall environmental performance.

Ownership Costs and Fuel Planning Strategies

Understanding the 2016 Ford Explorer’s fuel tank capacity is essential for calculating ownership costs. With varying gas prices across regions, drivers need to know how far they can travel on a full tank and how often they will need to refuel.

  1. Calculate your average miles per gallon by tracking odometer readings and fuel purchases over several tanks.
  2. Use online fuel cost calculators to estimate monthly or annual expenses based on your driving habits.
  3. Consider the impact of premium versus regular gasoline, as some models recommend higher-octane fuel for optimal performance.

For long trips, planning around the 24.0-gallon capacity can prevent inconvenient detours. For instance, a driver covering 600 miles would need to refuel at least once, assuming a 450-mile practical range. Staggering fuel stops with other errands can improve efficiency and reduce downtime.

Comparative Perspective and Industry Context

When compared to competitors in the mid-size SUV segment, the 2016 Ford Explorer’s 24.0-gallon fuel tank holds its own. Many rivals in this class offer tanks ranging from 16 to 18 gallons, which can limit their range. Larger SUVs, such as three-row models, often feature tanks of 22 to 26 gallons, positioning the Explorer as a practical choice for families who need both space and range.

“Fuel tank capacity is one of the key factors customers consider when evaluating SUVs for road trips,” said an industry analyst familiar with Ford’s product planning. “The 2016 Explorer’s 24-gallon tank reflects Ford’s commitment to balancing capability with usability.”

Maintenance and Fuel Tank Longevity

Proper maintenance can extend the life of the 2016 Explorer’s fuel tank and associated components. Over time, rubber fuel lines may degrade, and the fuel pump, located inside the tank, may wear out. Regular inspections and timely replacement of fuel filters can help maintain optimal fuel flow and system reliability.

Contaminants in low-quality gasoline can also affect tank performance. Using fuel from reputable stations and adhering to Ford’s recommended maintenance schedule helps prevent issues such as clogged injectors or increased emissions. If a fuel leak or strong gasoline odor is detected, immediate service is advised to ensure safety.

Environmental Impact and Fuel Efficiency Trends

The 2016 Ford Explorer’s fuel tank size and overall efficiency reflect the industry’s response to tightening emissions regulations and growing consumer demand for better fuel economy. While larger tanks enable longer range, they also increase vehicle weight, which can affect efficiency.

Ford addressed this challenge by incorporating lightweight materials and aerodynamic improvements into the Explorer’s design. These efforts helped the model maintain competitive fuel economy figures despite its size and capability. For environmentally conscious buyers, pairing a full tank with efficient driving habits remains the most effective way to reduce overall emissions.

Written by Elena Petrova

Elena Petrova is a Chief Correspondent with over a decade of experience covering breaking trends, in-depth analysis, and exclusive insights.